The End of Darwinian Evolution? (It’s not my idea!)


I have enjoyed healthy debates with certain evolutionist friends who have stopped by to try and argue their way out of wet paper sacks. I happened across this article at Jason G’s  blog and thought I would would give it some more life here since perhaps my friends haven’t seen it or haven’t visited Jason G’s blog. This is a short article by Freeman Dyson (Freeman Dyson is professor emeritus of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton where his research has focused on the internal physics of stars, subatomic-particle beams and the origin of life.–from NPQ) and was posted on July 23, 2007 at New Perspectives Quarterly online.

Dyson wrote, in part:

Now, after some 3 billion years, the Darwinian era is over. The epoch of species competition came to an end about 10,000 years ago when a single species, Homo sapiens, began to dominate and reorganize the biosphere. Since that time, cultural evolution has replaced biological evolution as the driving force of change. Cultural evolution is not Darwinian. Cultures spread by horizontal transfer of ideas more than by genetic inheritance. Cultural evolution is running a thousand times faster than Darwinian evolution, taking us into a new era of cultural interdependence that we call globalization. And now, in the last 30 years, Homo sapiens has revived the ancient pre-Darwinian practice of horizontal gene transfer, moving genes easily from microbes to plants and animals, blurring the boundaries between species. We are moving rapidly into the post-Darwinian era, when species will no longer exist, and the evolution of life will again be communal.

Jason G quips: “How’s this for a vision of the future? Will we still be able to get the old varieties of roses and orchids … ?”

I think the best question in the essay is, “When did Darwinian Evolution begin?” which is actually a question posed by Carl Woese (of whom I have no information save for that which Dyson divulges). It is an interesting article. Again, like those bones we talked about in another post, I don’t know (nor do I think it does) if it means anything. I think it is an example of another evolutionist grasping as straws, gasping for some hope to come out of an otherwise hopeless, meaningless proposition. In short, it is a fine example of futility. But read the entire essay, it is easy enough to understand. Don’t make too much of it. It means nothing to those who reject Darwinism as a valid intellectual pursuit.

It is a grasp, a gasp. It is the horror of knowing that your life is, essentially, meaningless. I agree with Jason: “How’s this for a future?”


PS–Thanks to Jason G at PT Forsyth Files for originally posting the link to this essay.

2 thoughts on “The End of Darwinian Evolution? (It’s not my idea!)

  1. Thank goodness that evolution is a ‘scientific’ fairy tale.

    But if the evolutionists want to ‘prove’ their beliefs let them build us a ‘simple’ cell from scratch.

    After all, shouldn’t all the combined Intelligence of all the worlds scientist be able the do what chance encounters with random chemicals, without a set of instructions, accomplished about 4 billion years ago,according to the evolutionists, having no intelligence at all available to help them along in their quest to become a living entity. Surely then the evolutionists scientists today should be able to make us a ‘simple’ cell.

    If it weren’t so pitiful it would be humorous, that intelligent people have swallowed the evolution mythology.

    Beyond doubt, the main reason people believe in evolution is that sources they admire, say it is so. It would pay for these people to do a thorough examination of all the evidence CONTRARY to evolution that is readily available: Try The evolutionists should honestly examine the SUPPOSED evidence ‘FOR’ evolution for THEMSELVES.

    Build us a cell, from scratch, with the required raw material, that is with NO cell material, just the ‘raw’ stuff, and the argument is over. But if the scientists are unsuccessful, perhaps they should try Mother Earth’s recipe, you know, the one they claim worked the first time about 4 billion years ago, so they say. All they need to do is to gather all the chemicals that we know are essential for life, pour them into a large clay pot and stir vigorously for a few billion years, and Walla, LIFE!

    Oh, you don’t believe the ‘original’ Mother Earth recipe will work? You are NOT alone, Neither do I, and MILLIONS of others!

    PS: Please don’t lie about the ‘first life’ problem, scientists are falling all over themselves to make a living cell. Many have admitted publicly that it is a monumental problem. And is many years away from happening, if ever. Logical people understand this problem and have rightly concluded that an Intelligent Designer was absolutely necessary. Think of it this way, if all the brilliant scientists on earth can’t do it how on earth can anyone believe that it happened by accident?????

  2. Jim,

    Thanks for reading and posting. Uh, I’m not sure I’m lying about anything, but maybe you are not saying that I am. Either way, thanks for reading and replying.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s