More Global Warming Lies…for Children!


Here’s how the world of ‘science’ wishes to indoctrinate our children: They lie. That’s right. See this story about The Down to Earth Guide to Global Warming.

But Robert Ferguson, president of the Science and Public Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., published findings today that reveal a “glaring scientific error.”

On page 18 of “The Down-to-Earth Guide to Global Warming,” the book has a graph accompanied by the statement, “The more the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the higher the temperature climbed. The less carbon dioxide, the more the temperature fell.”

And there’s more!

“The authors mislabeled the blue curve as temperature and mislabeled the red curve as CO2 concentration,” he explained.

Ferguson said the David-Gordon “manipulation” is critical because the central premise of the book argues CO2 drives temperature, “yet the ice core data clearly reveal temperature increases generally precede increasing CO2 by several hundred to a few thousand years.”

“This fact may have been too inconvenient for David, who instead presented young readers with an astoundingly irresponsible falsehood,” Ferguson said. “Parents and teachers of these children should be concerned.”

What I wonder is this, if the evidence is so overwhelmingly true, why resort to lies? Why, oh science, why?

And there’s more!

Ferguson argues the peer-reviewed literature is “unanimous” in finding that in climate records CO2 changes historically have followed temperature changes and cannot have caused them.

“The book is mischievous for concluding that this deceptive graph has anything to do with ‘discovering’ a link between additional CO2 concentrations and ‘global warming,'” Ferguson declares.

Well, I for one am very concerned about this. How can we possibly trust science if they must resort to lies to support their case? How can I trust them on such serious issues as cow flatulence and polar bear populations? How can I trust science about my great-grandparents’ (several times over) evolutionary links? My entire world has been shaken. I’m just not sure if I can believe in evolution any more! I’m gonna have to rethink it all. The lie has been revealed!

PS–The Down to Earth Guide to Global Warming is co-authored by Laurie David and Cambria Gordon. It is published by Scholastic and probably costs way too much money, but should help David and Cambria firm up their retirement funds because there are people who will buy it. I also imagine that we will soon see a plethora of publishing house apologies for the ‘oversight’ and explanations about how the ‘image was accidentally reversed by a cross-eyed machine operator’ who had a grudge against David. We will probably also learn that he was recently fired from his job after 58 years of faithful service.

And another question: What scientific credentials does Laurie David have that she can write such a book? These people are so unbelievably full of themselves.

There’s even a forum for the book!

And biographies of the authors!

You can buy the book from amazon for an amazingly low price of $10.87!

scientifically yours,


Uh, I should point out that neither David nor Gordon are scientists. They are activists. Neither, so far as my research is concerned, has a degree in any scientific field of study. Gordon did write a book title: Fifty Nifty Crafts to Make With Things Around the House. David once traveled around on a ‘biodiesel tour bus.’ This makes both of them authorities. So we should really start taking global warming seriously.


  1. Climatology has only little to do with real science. Yes, climatology is based on a lot of “lies to children” and under scrutany a lot of claims fall flat.

    You have to understand that climatology has absolutely nothing to do with any other branch of science. It is the same as saying that because a new medical drug called “bibbity-bobbity-boo” failed in trials and was shown to cause cancer, that engineers are no longer allowed to build safe bridges until science re-evaluates the “lies” about the BBB pill.

    I have personally had a growing dislike for environmental activists over the past three years thanks to exposure to other *scientific* studies. Most climatologists you will find (like David and Gordon and Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio, etcetera) are not scientists. I call climatology the New Church of Climatology, where facts are in short supply and speculation is through the roof. Descenters are called “heretics” or whatever and seen as being “uneducated” or worse.

    All that I am trying to say here is that you shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. That would be presenting a false dichotomy (take all science or take no science).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: