Some Thoughts on Darwinisms Demise

Friends,

Darwinism is defunct, deadly, and dying.

Stunning Documentary Links Darwin, Hitler.

Charles Darwin should share with Adolph Hitler the blame for the 11 million or more lives lost in the Holocaust, a provocative video documentary explains. And, the program says, the more than 45 million American lives lost to abortion also can be blamed on that famous founder of evolutionary theory.”

This is just a bit. Click the link for more.

Also, see this amazing, 17 page pdf: A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism.

We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”

The copy I have linked to was updated in February 2007. The document lists the current position the scientist holds, and their academic credentials.

Also see: Dissent From Darwin.

You will be amazed at how many scientists question the Darwinian theory of evolution thus countering the commonly held belief and propaganda that all scientists with credentials believe in bunk theories like Darwinism.

Also see: Doctors Doubting Darwin.

Then there’s: Survival of the Fakest.

What all of this shows, at least in part, is that Darwinism is not as commonly accepted among the ‘intellectual elite’ (R Dawkins words) as we have been led to believe. One would think that Darwinism is such a lock that there would be no dissent from any scientist ever, that there would only be consensus. I think these documents point us in the direction where we can confidently say: That is not true!

Happily, there are plenty of rational people in the scientific world who understand what the real issues are in this battle. Happily, those of us who know how to think, who enjoy mystery because it gives us a reason to continue searching, and delight in the power of God, can truly see what Darwinism is at its roots: Life without God.

Have a blessed day, and if you see a Darwinist, or hear from a teacher that Darwin had all the answers, print the seventeen pages or give them a link. Don’t fear those who have no answers and thus must invent theories to explain what their small minds cannot grasp. Believe in the God of Creation.

jerry

Advertisements

  1. Ron

    Jerry

    You just now catching on to that propaganda video? You’re about 9 months behind. That brilliant philosopher D. James Kennedy (Coral Ridge Ministries–but you knew already, I’m sure) was going to broadcast it and a big stink ensued. That documentary had a few out-of-context snips of an interview with an actual scientist who’s also a Christian (or thinks he is, eh?), Francis Collins. The snips made it appear as if Collins doesn’t accept evolution. The only problem is that he does. When he found out what Coral Ridge was about to do, he demanded they take him completely out of it. Funny what some people will do for Jesus, isn’t it?
    But apart from that, the video’s gold, I’m just so sure.

    Collins is one of those Christians that’s just not as close to Jesus as you are, because he accepts evolution.

    But you already know how stupid those scientists are, don’t you? This guy actually thinks he knows something about biology, just because he’s a biologist. Why, everybody knows that when you need advice on biology you go to a lawyer like Phillip Johnson, huh?

    You’re Nobel Prize bait, that’s for sure!

  2. Ron

    Oh, and I forgot to mention–he just headed the Human Genome Project, that’s all. Collins. Not Phillip Johnson.

  3. Ron,

    I reviewed something by Collins here at my blog. I know about him. And you are right, he doesn’t know anything because, once again, there is simply no connection possible between evolution and the Bible. (I will be writing why in a day or two.) I’m sure he’s a superb scientist, but his views on our origins are meaningless. And just because he knows ‘something’ about science, doesn’t mean he knows anything about Scripture.

    Face it, he’s trying to sell a book to the widest possible audience he can. Who cares about the human genome project? That doesn’t make Collins an authority on life, origins, or Scripture even if it makes him an authority on gene sequences. But heck, so were the ‘scientists’ in Jurassic Park and we see where that got them now haven’t we?

    Thanks for stopping by. I do wish you would try to not be so crass. But I understand you need something to hold onto right?

    jerry

    PS–Dr Kennedy (RIP) is now deceased. Perhaps you could have a little class and respect.

  4. Ron

    Jerry–

    If I’m short with you–and I am–you entrap me into it by saying…well, stupid things.

    You dismiss internationally recognized experts on complex subjects like evolution, but cite lawyers like Phillip Johnson instead. And the sole reason you do it is because they’re Christian fundamentalists like you are.
    Drawing some kind of comparison between a scientist of Collins’s stature and the scientists in Jurassic Park is comical, to say the least. What’s next? You going to start quoting the Flintstones?

    News flash: Biologists know more about biology than preachers do.

    And as for

    PS–Dr Kennedy (RIP) is now deceased. Perhaps you could have a little class and respect.

    If it’s any help, I think more highly of him now that he’s dead than I did when he was alive.

  5. Ron,

    What is next is that I’m going to consider you for the ignorant hack that you are and start ignoring you. There is no difference between quoting Jurassic Park and some ‘peer-reviewed’ paper: They both say the same thing, they’re both based on the same premise, they both involve the same circular reasoning, and they are both full of easily dismissed false information about the construction of life on this planet. (Like a dinosaur could be made from splicing frog DNA! Shouldn’t it have been bird DNA they used? After all, the intelligensia of ‘internationally recognized’ science academy would have us believe dinosaurs and birds are related to one another (or evolved from one another.) That is beyond laughable. And yet it is the same sort of mindless banality that comes from your precious internationally recognized scientists. You’re the one not bright enough to figure that out on your own.

    Who are these ‘internationally recognized experts’ you are referring to? Do you mean to imply that everyone knows them? Or do you mean to suggest that because they are ‘internationally recognized’ that we should listen to them as if their international recognition suddenly makes them smarter or more gifted or academic gods? Like, for real, Britney Spears is also internationally recognized; should we listen to her for parenting advice or career advice? Saddam Husseine was internationally recognized; should we have gone to him for advice on how to run a country? Seriously, do you do any research on your own or do you just sit around and swallow whole everything that spews from the mouths of these pathetic fools?

    I can’t quote the Flintstones because I’m quite certain you wouldn’t get it.

    jerry

    ps–I think until you have something intelligent and substantial to say, I’m going to stop responding to you. Until you can demonstrate, incremental, step by step natural selection, I will consider you another rube who has been duped by the international academy of morons and un-intelligentsia and un-intellectual elite.

    But every now and again I will pray for you in the hope that the Lord God himself will shake you out of your lethargy, squash your hubris, and call you to repentance in the Name of Jesus Christ who died even for your sins. Everyone who calls on the Name of the Lord will be saved. I think it’s time you called on Him.

    Good luck!

  6. Ron

    Jerry–

    Here’s one of the ways I can tell that your opposition to evolution is all religion and no science:

    You–

    There is no difference between quoting Jurassic Park and some ‘peer-reviewed’ paper: They both say the same thing, they’re both based on the same premise, they both involve the same circular reasoning, and they are both full of easily dismissed false information about the construction of life on this planet.

    and

    Until you can demonstrate, incremental, step by step natural selection, I will consider you another rube who has been duped by the international academy of morons and un-intelligentsia and un-intellectual elite.

    So the case for evolution is an insult to your intelligence, since according to you the evidence is so weak and circular. Okay, so what do you believe instead?

    You believe that the Almighty just poofed everything into existence in six days, and then needed to take a day off because he was tired.. You believe also that this same intelligent designer made the first man by blowing into dirt.

    Now you’ve said the evidence for the scientific version is inadequate. Please describe–in as much detail as you can–the scientific evidence that supports the Genesis account. Please describe the scientific evidence that proves that the first woman actually came from the rib of the first man.

  7. Ron,

    Thanks.

    Have a nice day.

    jerry

    PS–Where does evolution think we came from?




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: